• Noreng@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nowhere, like it should be. The launch was a disaster because AMD pushed the clock/power targets extremely high in order to “compete” with the 780 and 780 Ti, with the end result being a jet engine in terms of noise.

    It wasn’t until February before MSI and ASUS released better cooled cards, at which point the damage from reviews and lack of holiday sales had accumulated.

    In the 7970’s case, AMD had at least the benefit of being 3 months early compared to Nvidia.

    • GuttedLikeCornishHen@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What are you on about, nvidia had to lower price on 780 twice and issue an emergency SKU in form of 780Ti to be able to compete on price/performance with Hawaii. R9 290 (non-X) was a steal at its price considering how long it managed to stay relevant in the years ahead. GCN driver improvement also added a significant chunk of performance (9k GS in FS at release and around 15k with OC and driver improvements 3 years later). Also, Kepler blower cards were also loud, so the point is sort of not a point at all

      • Noreng@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        How would you have known that the 290 would perform better in 2016?

        As for the price cuts, I remember the 780 Ti launch, and the 780 launch was effectively a cut from the Titan.

        The 780 price cut was the reason for the jet engine cooler on the 290-series in the first place.