• PhantomGaming27249@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t smic just start working on using particle accelerators as an alternative to euv? I mean aside from the size requirement I don’t really see the euv ban slowing China too much.

  • Jeffy29@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “It is just not possible for the US to completely prevent China from improving its chip technology,” Lin told Bloomberg.

    Whoever claimed otherwise? Vague statements like this are a form of truism, of course they can’t prevent them for literally forever but forever was not the goal. Nations have chosen to not share certain strategically important resources or technologies since dawn of time, idk why all of a sudden now everyone pretends like it’s some kind of an aberration.

  • bahn_pho@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the US really should do is to focus on maintaining its chip design leadership instead of trying to limit China’s progress

    Chip design leadership = selling the same thing over and over right intel lol. Shocking how that isnt competitive with like, actually building all the things.

  • Drakyry@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think their plan is to halt or even significantly delay, rather to just make it more expensive and show others not to go against the americas interests