At the moment i have a 13700f and it looks like i have a cpu bottleneck with my current gpu (a 4090) and im not sure what would be the best option for upgrading since im also a bit flat on money now since i got my new gpu

Also im not sure if the prices here in my country are high but the 13900k is about 700 USD and the 14900k is about 800usd and the 14700k is about 500usd.

  • SnooPandas2964@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    13700k is already pretty damn good you shouldn’t need to upgrade, you already have all 8 pcores.

    But sure if you want you could get a 14700k or 14900k. Probably 14900k if you want to see a difference. But again, it will be small. You already have 95% of the gaming performance avaliable on the socket.

    Are you sure you’re not experiencing, like a game engine limitation or something? What are you trying to do that you can’t?

    • simbly101@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      But I have the 13700f not a k…

      Its cuz whenever i play games after i switched my gpu i cant get higher than 70% utilisation on the gpu where my cpu is pushing all it can

      • Noreng@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Let’s assume you get a 14900K then, overclock it to 6 GHz P-cores using direct die cooling, and throw on 8000 MT/s DDR5 with a Z790 Apex Encore for good measure. You’re now somewhere around 30% faster in games than your previous setup, and GPU utilization will occasionally hit 90% instead of 70%

        All for the neat sum of roughly 2000 USD

      • SnooPandas2964@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh I see. Sorry I missed that. Yeah I suppose a 14700k wouldn’t be a bad upgrade since you can still get pretty good money for your existing cpu. Your all core boost would go from 5.1 to 5.5. Thats something. But just so you know, it can be hard to get 100% utilization out of the 4090 on any cpu, especially at lower resolutions.

      • AdrusFTS@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        a 14900K is about what? 5-10% faster? not worth it, wait a few months and buy a 8800X3D

          • AdrusFTS@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            yeah… most people dont care about multithreading, and yeah, 12% st is important, but 8800X3D is said to deliver 20% better st? read that even 30% is possible, while being way way more efficient and like 30-40% better in gaming… 14900K is a waste of money if already have the 13700

          • AdrusFTS@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            and i say that an i9 is pointless as a 13900K owner, ill upgrade ASA 8800X3Ds are available

            • Adventurous_Dingo_79@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              As a 13700F and 14900K owner I’ll say that I’ll be waiting to see how the 8800X3Ds actually perform before even thinking about getting one.

          • RB5Network@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The difference is how well AMD supports their platform to be honest. AM5 could easily last someone ten years. I’d say it’s absolutely atleast worth considering. Until Intel abandons their current socket and platform changes I’ll absolutely never go back.