Never have I been more disappointed by a camera on a phone ever. Foliage looks terrible, 48mp photos during the day aren’t any more detailed than the 12mp photos on my S8 while having strange artifacts, lens smearing, and terrible video outdoors and in very dark scenes (indoors in semi-ideal conditions is the only time it’s good). The 12mp photos should be the go-to but they’re a disaster, 8mp level of detail. And you can sort of fix this by turning off noise reduction but this phone is not designed for custom camera apps in mind so camera2api support is limited. Why does samsung solely give quality control checks on their flagships only? Do they truly believe people can’t just buy second hand phones from the used market and get the same level of quality control?

  • gregDev55@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You buy a piss-budget phone and you expect it to be good? Then why do they make flagships?

      • gregDev55@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You need to get a few things straight. When you buy a phone, you don’t buy just the hardware of it, the camera is one of the many sensors. You primarily buy software support. If companies supported their phones indefinitely we would stay with our old phones until they stopped working but no. You wanted Android 13 & 14 and their new features because Android 9 wasn’t cutting it any longer. In addition you got security patches that is why you got a new phone, stop pretending that you didn’t know that in the first place. It will take more than 5 years for a midrange phone to catch up to a flagship specs-wise but that doesn’t mean that an old phone is better or secure to use.

  • DEWDEM@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    A33 isn’t even focused on the cameras. A5X is where the cameras get good. S8 was a well-rounded flagship, which is something the A34 isn’t

  • RenderBender_Uranus@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The camera is not the problem it uses the venerable 48mp module used by other OEMs that have better IQ than the A33. The problem is processing power, or the lack of it.

  • MerBudd@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Hm I wonder why a Galaxy A3X phone has a terrible camera (Btw it is their 4th cheapest phone in their lineup)”

  • sanntos@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s a budget phone. S8 was great for its time before AI and stuff.

    In some conditions it could take decent images but yes, at the end of the day it’s still a budget phone that can’t take photos like other mainstream or high-end phones.

    For that, can’t blame them. For not making S23 series more “natural” and improving their quality, yes. That’s just the way that companies work these days.