Hardware Watch
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Stiven_Crysis@alien.topB to AMDEnglish · 2 years ago

Even faster: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX shatters Cinebench R23 world record at 210K points and 6.2 GHz OC - VideoCardz.com

videocardz.com

external-link
message-square
19
link
fedilink
2
external-link

Even faster: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX shatters Cinebench R23 world record at 210K points and 6.2 GHz OC - VideoCardz.com

videocardz.com

Stiven_Crysis@alien.topB to AMDEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
19
link
fedilink
AMD Threadripper breaks Cinebench R23 world record with 210K points AMD is reclaiming its dominance in the extreme overclocking scene, challenging Intel’s long-standing position. The Threadripper 7000WX series, while arriving a year later than the desktop Zen4 series, has proven superior to Intel’s Xeon Sapphire Rapids WS CPUs without even a need for exotic cooling […]
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • CSTITAN576@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Damn

  • Rudradev715@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Holy shit it’s nuts

    • OneYearSteakDay@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The AMD Athlon was the first CPU to hit 1GHz back in 1999, it had one core, one thread, and a one gigahertz clock rate.

      Today we’re hitting 6.2GHz on 96 core CPUs.

      It’s wild living in the future.

      • lordofthedrones@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I had the P3 back then! Amazing CPU; very, very fast.

  • Inchmine@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yes but where are the WRX90 motherboards?

  • retiredwindowcleaner@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    whats interesting to see is that even with decent air or h2o cooling you can get a huge uplift as sampson’s entries show.

    • Jism_nl@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It kind of beats the whole point,

      If you need that uplift so bad in applications or games that do not scale well with 96 cores or 192 threads, your better off using a Ryzen to be fair.

      This is a workhorse - not intended to be OC’ed to snot. And even if you do the power requirements would be utterly insane and likely over 1.5KWh when fully stressed.

  • TheDarthSnarf@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    And it too can be yours, for the low-low price of $9,999.99!

    • Shiroi_Kage@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Do you actually need something like this? You’d probably be better off looking at used Epyc chips.

      • Eudyptes1@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Need got nothing to do with it.

        • Shiroi_Kage@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Some people need this kind of chip. That’s why I asked. If he needs it but on a budget, Epyc chips from previous gens or from this gen in the future would be much better value.

    • ziggo0@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have a feeling these are going to hold some decent value for many years to come. Till then I shall stare into the window :(

      • StriderVM@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        About 20 years or less. I mean those used 18 core Xeons are now available for $100. The issue at that point is not the processors but motherboards.

  • PhilosophyforOne@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Would be fascinating to see the power draw numbers on that thing.

    Since the liquid cooled ones were running up to 1k, this thing must’ve been hitting up 1.5, 2k watts power draw.

    • SsamxX@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      In the article are written 395watts max power usage

      • Shiroi_Kage@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s no way that that’s the draw under load and OC. I think this is more like the regular power draw plus a little more.

  • Emergency-Client-432@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    how much?!

  • collins_amber@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    What 10k gets you : first place at cb

    • Yeuph@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      worth

AMD

amd

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !amd@hardware.watch

For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2 users / day
  • 2 users / week
  • 2 users / month
  • 2 users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 28 subscribers
  • 260 Posts
  • 3.68K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • communick
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org