My recent experience with the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s camera during a concert was far from stellar. It was terrible, to say the least. The phone’s sluggish response time made capturing moments a frustrating task, and the super slow shutter speed resulted in consistently blurry images. Comparatively, a friend using a much older iPhone 14 Pro Max effortlessly captured sharper shots because of its faster shutter speed. While the phone obviously excels in daylight photography, it struggles in low-light conditions and with moving objects. The lingering question is: Why hasn’t Samsung addressed these performance issues promptly?

I wish I could post the comparison pictures between hers and mine pictures. All the pictures I took of the artist looked like she was made of wax. It’s mind-blowing how a 200mp camera was unable to take better pictures than a 12mp camera. And we were both front row, so the artist was less than 5 feet away from us.

For video, it worked great. For pictures, not so much…

  • Suspicious_Durian631@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dont listen to folks here. Honestly, Samsung camera is inferior to its competitors in this department. iPhones and Pixels are best low light shooters because of faster shutter speeds.

    During daylight, S23U can compete with them. Nightshoots yes, but if objects are moving, no.

    Your best chance is to manually lower shutter speeds in pro mode, but you will loose auto HDR and other sw settings.

    Unfortanetly, Samsung is #4 place in photography.

    1. iPhones
    2. Pixels
    3. Huawei
    4. Samsung