• A_Seiv_For_Kale@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It looks like they’ve gotten better recently, but exactly how much isn’t really clear.

      Backblaze lifetime annual failure rates for:

      HDDs: 1.45%

      SSDs: 0.90%

      The HDD AFR is +0.55%, but if you look at the drive count and drive day numbers, you can see why the SSD AFR varies pretty wildly, and why the confidence interval is way higher.
      If you think this is enough to say SSDs reliability is definitively solved, that’s fine, but

      HHDs have mechanical parts that make them far less reliable.

      is a bit much.

      • Nicholas-Steel@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        SSD’s just need good power delivery and cooling, where as a HDD needs those plus a means of dampening vibration for good longevity.

        HDD’s are no longer a good choice for mobile devices like laptops as an SSD is more likely to survive a fall than a HDD.

        SSD’s however require periodic supply of power to maintain data integrity (power it on for an hour each year afaik), where as a HDD does not.