forthemostpart@alien.topB to AppleEnglish · 1 year agoiLeakage: Browser-based Timerless Speculative Execution Attacks on Apple Devicesileakage.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkiLeakage: Browser-based Timerless Speculative Execution Attacks on Apple Devicesileakage.comforthemostpart@alien.topB to AppleEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squareCreepyZookeepergame4@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAs usual, Safari’s lack of site isolation shows it’s impact. https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/site-isolation/
minus-squareSlitted@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoPeople here seem to prefer Safari not having site isolation as long as they save a few hundred MB in RAM use and half an hour of longer battery duration compared to Blink browsers. I like Safari but this is a bummer.
minus-squareCreepyZookeepergame4@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago People here seem to prefer Safari not having site isolation Well It’s not like there is choice on iOS. Also not just site isolation: https://www.wired.com/story/ios-security-imessage-safari/ Unfortunately the most secure browser (Chrome) is also the least privacy respecting.
As usual, Safari’s lack of site isolation shows it’s impact.
https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/site-isolation/
People here seem to prefer Safari not having site isolation as long as they save a few hundred MB in RAM use and half an hour of longer battery duration compared to Blink browsers.
I like Safari but this is a bummer.
Well It’s not like there is choice on iOS. Also not just site isolation: https://www.wired.com/story/ios-security-imessage-safari/ Unfortunately the most secure browser (Chrome) is also the least privacy respecting.