Sharing my attempt at a handy list of 1440p Raster performance numbers, expanded from past meta review of GPUs posted by u/Voodoo2-SLi
This is a very limited take though, just 1440p Raster numbers as percentages. The basic data is from Voodoo’s 7700 XT and 7800 XT meta review post. Other GPUs are filled in with back-calculated numbers inferred from Voodoo’s previous meta review posts, in reverse chronological order as: 4060 Ti and 7600 meta review post, 4070 meta review post, and 4070 Ti meta review post. As example, 3060-12G numbers were calculated as:
70.7 (4060 Ti-8G percentage from 7800 XT meta review) x 69.2 (3060 Ti-12G percentage from 4060 Ti meta review) /100 = 48.92.
Since the set of games tested by various reviewers change across months- typically with increased GPU requirements- the filled in GPU data may not be highly accurate, but should still be fairly representative of the performance.
If you find any inaccuracies, please point them out, and I will make corrections in the table as needed.
| GPU | 1440p perf |
|---|---|
| 6600 | 43.06% |
| 3060-12G | 48.92% |
| 6650 XT | 52.25% |
| A770 LE | 55.15% |
| 7600 | 55.43% |
| 3060 Ti | 64.69% |
| 6700 XT | 67.40% |
| 4060 Ti-8G | 70.70% |
| 4060 Ti-16G | 71.20% |
| 3070 | 73.74% |
| 3070 Ti | 79.90% |
| 6800 | 82.70% |
| 7700 XT | 85.60% |
| 4070 | 95.00% |
| 6800 XT | 95.70% |
| 3080-10G | 95.86% |
| 7800 XT | 100.00% |
| 6900 XT | 103.90% |
| 3090 | 106.30% |
| 6950 XT | 109.35% |
| 4070 Ti | 115.05% |
| 3090 Ti | 115.05% |
| 7900 XT | 128.00% |
| 4080 | 138.30% |
| 7900 XTX | 140.60% |
| 4090 | 165.20% |
3080 can dlss it self to being a 4k card but 7800xt will always be a 1440p card because fsr looks bad.
If you are using upscaling, then it’s not 4K anymore. Nothing wrong with rendering at a lower resolution. I think cleaned up 1080p looks good enough for me, I wouldn’t call that 4K.
7800xt can still use XeSS which is closer to DLSS.