Im not quite sure to understand the difference. I mean, I do understand what is the antiglare (or so I think haha), but I see people saying that the 1tb is the worst option for OLED because of the antiglare. But at the same time I read that it solves the issues with any screen protector?
Can someone explain why is it worst for OLED and if ALL issues with the antiglare are solved with ANY screen protector and why?
Thank you!
Don’t let this be a decision maker.
For perfect image clarity, you don’t want anti-glare. The way it works is the screen has micro etching in it to scatter light. That means the picture coming through the glass from the display is imperfect. You might not care and you might not notice, but that’s what it does.
What I recommend (mostly because I think it’s rarely worth paying the price hike for built in storage) is to buy the middle option and if the glare from your double chin looking back at you bothers you, get an anti glare screen protector. That’s what I did and I am very glad I did because any time the screen goes black (like a loading screen, it happens a lot) you’re gonna see your dumb face right fucking there. Not fun.
But that gives you flexibility to try both options. The screen protectors are cheap and work well and you’ll probably want a screen protector either way whether you want matte or glossy.
512GB OLED. I’m only going to be using the steamdeck at home anyway. Glare should not be an issue