• Put_It_All_On_Blck@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article says a source claims he has made money from other crypto ventures, and Google’s totally not accurate results are saying his net worth is $500m, but even if that was true, why sit on a 50% increase of net wealth that is highly volatile? Also I’d imagine his contract with the two experts he contacted would have NDAs and prevent any discussion of the client, but then again the one solo expert he hired spoke openly to Wired. Finally, if you had $200 million in bitcoin, would you actually leave it there? I absolutely wouldnt.

    Also if he already had access to the coins, why bother with this charade? Nobody knew his story till he made it public, he allegedly only reached out to the 2 experts last year, and spoke about it on a video podcast earlier this year, and now briefly to Wired. If he gained access why not put the story to rest with a lie that a third expert killed the device and he’s done with the stress of it all and moving on.

    The whole thing is off.