• 1 Post
  • 8 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 2nd, 2023

help-circle



    1. Yep, you can have multiple BT devices connected at once. I typically have my xbox controller, bt headset, and a bt speaker connected at all times! From my understanding the way the Xbox itself handles the audio is through a wifi-direct connection, not bluetooth. Can confirm that BT connected xbox controller does NOT allow audio. Default audio operations in KDE/Gamescope will route to last connected device. If you install qpwgraph you can control audio routing pretty easily in KDE - I usually have game audio going to headset and music from chrome/youtube going to my bt speaker for background noise.

    2. A lot of the USB-C dongles like this one have a USBC-PD (Power Delivery) capable port, so you can get away with using that if yours does. Having said that, literally any Steam Deck dock is worth it just for displaying your handheld! You can find them for $20-40USD on Amazon, and right now lots have discounts due to Black Friday sales!

    3. Honestly that’s your call… Personally, I play on the TV most of the time, and the LCD still looks pretty damn good when I do play handheld. For me, it’s a “what I don’t know, won’t hurt me” situation, and you can get the LCD version for pretty darn cheap (compared to retail) these days thanks to the OLED release. Unfortunately, and I don’t understand why, the wake on bluetooth doesn’t work on the LCD w/SteamOS 3.5.7.

    Feel free to ask any more questions you might have and I can do my best to answer!




  • Sure… but literally any type of lookup is vulnerable to MITM without something like DNSSEC, which isn’t too common outside of enterprise or managed DNS servers like cloudflare, etc (which still require configuration). Most users, unless they WORK in InfoSec, literally don’t bother with (or even are aware of) it.

    At that point you’re kinda just drawing up what-if’s - and while technically valid, it’s also a very limited concern.

    It’s more common to access a computer by hostname on a LAN than it is to have a MITM on your network. If you do, you have bigger concerns.


  • I think you’re misunderstanding the concept of “.local TLD is considered unsafe.”

    It’s not UNSAFE unsafe… It’s unsafe to resolve .local TLD yourself as it’s a protocol specifically to avoid having a DNS server. Resolving yourself on a DNS would result in conflicts, which is the “unsafe” part.

    As for the comment you linked to, this directly coincides with why it’s not a DNS Search, and is a “unicast” (actually it’s a multicast, not unicast) protocol.