- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
Relevant_Force_3470@alien.topBto
AMD•Alan Wake 2: FSR 2.2 vs. DLSS 3.5 Comparison ReviewEnglish
1·3 years ago30fps?
You need to go check out benchmarks…
Inform yourself then come back and we can talk.
Relevant_Force_3470@alien.topBto
AMD•Alan Wake 2: FSR 2.2 vs. DLSS 3.5 Comparison ReviewEnglish
1·3 years agoTheir software is indeed terrible. But they just seem so blinded on the hardware side by raw raster and MOAR vram. Makes no sense in modern games. Even Intel are doing a version of XeSS based on their AI cores. AMD is always just so far behind, software AND hardware.
Relevant_Force_3470@alien.topBto
AMD•Alan Wake 2: FSR 2.2 vs. DLSS 3.5 Comparison ReviewEnglish
1·3 years agoFine wine, lol
Relevant_Force_3470@alien.topBto
AMD•Alan Wake 2: FSR 2.2 vs. DLSS 3.5 Comparison ReviewEnglish
1·3 years agoNvidia wipe thier cocks all over amd’s face in cyberpunk. Not sure about the other games, as they’re a bit shite for my liking. COD I assume runs on a toaster.
Alan Wake 2 is reviewing very well. Its a good gane that also utilises modern tech; just what us gamers crave. So it is very relevant.
Relevant_Force_3470@alien.topBto
AMD•Alan Wake 2: FSR 2.2 vs. DLSS 3.5 Comparison ReviewEnglish
1·3 years agoAMD need to get their shit together as Nvidia are running away with quality, performance and ray tracing.
Relevant_Force_3470@alien.topBto
AMD•Alan Wake 2: FSR 2.2 vs. DLSS 3.5 Comparison ReviewEnglish
1·3 years agoAMD need to get their shit together as Nvidia are running away with quality, performance and ray tracing.
My mate in the LLM world borks at the idea of using AMD. All his workloads are done on nvidia. I can’t see that changing until AMD offer us something disruptive, which I doubt this is, sadly.