• 0 Posts
  • 3 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 26th, 2023

help-circle
  • Sinister_Crayon@alien.topBtoFrameworkShould I switch to Linux?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It depends greatly what you’re doing with your computer. I’ve been an Ubuntu primary user for at least a decade now, but there are still one or two things I can’t do with Linux… at least not as easily. Specifically in my case I have a PC dedicated to my synthesiser/MIDI setup simply because drivers, tools and plugins are readily available and supported on Windows while in Linux the support is good but has issues. A prime example is that my main synths are Roland synths, and Roland has a bad habit of not supporting standards fully for audio or MIDI over USB. I love my Roland synths but it made it too difficult to go Linux primary. That and some of the best tools are Windows-based like Ableton. However, that’s not to say you can’t do all of this in Linux; Renoise is a fantastic DAW as well that runs natively in Windows or Linux and there are plenty of great audio editing tools… it’s just interfacing with external gear is sometimes problematic and again some of my synths are plugins (VST’s) that either don’t work or aren’t well supported in environments other than Windows and Mac.

    If your primary use case is web browsing and maybe gaming (Steam works great with their Proton runtimes for most games) then you can easily switch to Linux and never miss a beat. Firefox and Chromium (not Chrome) are great and well supported, and while Microsoft Office isn’t directly supported you can run the web Office365 just fine or install LibreOffice and still mostly be able to edit documents and files. For photo editing and the like there’s GIMP and if you’re a photographer there are amazing tools like DarkTable that are absolutely brilliant and in some cases are so good I would run them on Windows as well.

    Ubuntu is probably one of the most mature and well-supported distros out there. Mint is also good and you won’t have any trouble with it, but when you do have issues with it the amount of support you can get for Ubuntu is among the best. There are things that Canonical do that annoy the Linux purists (systemd, Wayland as prime examples) for the average user these issues are pretty much moot. Even I who first installed Slackware Linux in 1993 and liked it don’t really care too much because the operating system gets out of my way and just works. I have one tool that requires me to run Xorg instead of Wayland (the GUI framwork… it’s complicated) but that’s literally the only issue I’ve had.

    HTH



  • I posted this in another comment but wanted to expand on it in a direct reply;

    It’s worth noting that a big problem with ARM is it’s not one unified architecture. x86-64 has both the problem and advantage that there are more than one manufacturer of CPU’s, but all of them are boxed into being compatible with Intel. This isn’t true with ARM; while the CPU architecture itself is nominally the same, individual vendors are free to implement that standard in myriad ways with myriad support chips that they can pick and choose or develop themselves. Something written for NVidia ARM won’t run on Qualcomm and vice versa, and neither will run on Mac. Unless stricter standards are wrapped around the architecture we’ll never see a true “generic ARM architecture” system. But that’ll never happen beacause it’s a violation of the terms of the agreements that the fabs signed with ARM.

    If a single vendor came along with an architecture design for ARM CPU that everyone liked and that vendor allowed other manufacturers to create compatible designs then we could see that standard appear. Maybe Framework could be that vendor… but right now they’re FAR too small with FAR to small pockets to develop an architecture of this magnitude. It’d have to be adaptable to laptops, desktops, datacenter, embedded… you name it. This would require a company with deep pockets and a LOT of engineers on staff. NVidia has both of those but is NEVER going to publish a standard so that Qualcomm can create a competing CPU. Apple’s not going to open their architecture up either for the exact same reason.