Apart from the two games with a collective daily peak of concurrent players on Steam sitting at 150 poor human souls, where are the FSR3 games?
But scratch FSR3 - where is FSR3.1 that would properly work with VRR screens and therefore could ACTUALLY be beneficial for people who can clearly see non-VRR judder?
Yes fully agree. I was fully sold on AMDs presentation when they launched 7900 series, and when I had a choice between buying 7900XT and 4070Ti, I chose 7900XT because of feature parity AMD promised us, and there was that big uprage about VRAM too back then as I remember. Year later (almost) I’m here, without proper FSR3.0 support they promised us, RT performance is there but it isn’t if we compare, and I sit and think that for my use case I shoid have chosen 4070Ti back then. Tough, I love Adrenaline, that’s a piece of what I missed most when I was on my 1070, where instead of 3 apps that I need to use I could use one.
Never buy a product based on future promises.
Bro I was in your same position a year ago, and now too. The energy consumption is 25% more on the amd side with only 5/10% more raster performance. I went for a full amd build and I will ever complain cpu/mobo performance. But I see when I try to turn on RT and lose 70% of the performance… is heartbreaking. But I think that the real problem isn’t amd side… look at Alan wake 2: when you turn off rt, it kicks rt software and it’s really good… I know that path rt it’s the Ferrari of gaming but I need 1600$ gpu for running it! So I’m pretty satisfied and I really want to see how fsr will kick the ass
Even a 4070 can play Alan wake with PT.
the VRAM issue is still real tho at least for 4k and maybe even in the future for 1440p. you shouldnt feel like you made a bad decision at least.
That’s sad to hear tbh, I still don’t understand why Nvidia cuts down so heavily in VRAM. Well, most likely to move their 4090 is most rational explanation