Apart from the two games with a collective daily peak of concurrent players on Steam sitting at 150 poor human souls, where are the FSR3 games?

But scratch FSR3 - where is FSR3.1 that would properly work with VRR screens and therefore could ACTUALLY be beneficial for people who can clearly see non-VRR judder?

  • nas360@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I am always rooting for AMD but this is entirely their fault. They do not seem to engage with devs or the community to promote FSR3 when we know it could be a game changer for many non-RTX gpu owners.

    If they neglect it like the FSR 2 upscaling shimmering issues then more and more people will turn to Nvidia in the long run.

    • Infamous_Campaign687@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not just non-RTX. All non 4000-series owners. FSR 3 has the potential to prolong the life of the 20 and 30-series. The RTX 3080 and 3090 may well increase in value when FSR 3 starts being delivered.

      • -Aeryn-@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not just non-RTX. All non 4000-series owners. FSR 3 has the potential to prolong the life of the 20 and 30-series. The RTX 3080 and 3090 may well increase in value when FSR 3 starts being delivered.

        FSR framegen breaks both DLSS and Reflex, replacing DLSS with a much worse alternative and offering no replacement to Reflex even on AMD cards - a non-negotiable core feature for GPU-bound gaming which only becomes more mandatory with added latency from frame gen.

        There is no game where i would turn FSR framegen on because it means either giving up those features or not having them present to begin with on a GPU-heavy game, which is not a good experience.