I guess the question comes down to Lenovo LOQ vs HP Victus, as virtually everything is better on the HP Victus. This was a no-brainer, right?
Returning: LOQ 16 (Paid $737.99 - $81.18 Rakuten Cashback)
- 7640HS
- RTX 4050
- 8GB DDR5 5600
- 512GB QLC SSD
- 16", 1920x1200, IPS, 144hz, 350 Nits
- 4-Cell 60Wh
- WiFi 6
Purchased: Victus 16.1 (Paid $769.99 w/ Upgrades - $77.00 Rakuten Cashback)
- 7640HS (Same)
- RTX 4050 (Same)
- 16GB DDR5 5600 (Better)
- 512GB TLC SSD (Better)
- 16.1", 1920x1080, IPS, 144Hz, 300 Nits (Worse)
- 6-Cell 83Wh (Better)
- WiFi 6E (Better)
dang Victus have dogshit quality tbh. And i don’t know why do people get 4050 in laptop when 3060 exists for lower price giving almost same performance, and mobile 3060 TI variant actually performs better with same price as 4050 laptops have. Better specks and lower price? Worse quality. You’ll be fine if your Victus would be stationary and opened all the time on desk. Other usage cases won’t lead to last it long enough