• deathblade200@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will add though : before the official release of 3.5.5 cu WAS improving performance.

    it never did it was always a placebo but people went so diehard on it they are afraid to admit being wrong.

    • Gaeus_@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Problem with that, is that in all your months of campaigns against cryo, you never provided any benchmark or comparison, very “boy who cried wolf” of you.

      I just did, it took me 20 minutes.

      And I did it before 3.5 and OLED too, I just simply did not consider the performance increase from 3.4 was 3.5 ALONE, since I was now used to think that cu=better due to my OWN test under 3.4 and it’s precursors.

      • deathblade200@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        he says as if people won’t make excuses regardless of whats done. just look at the comments in this very they are trying to pull out any excuse they can to avoid the truth. hell nobody could ever even beat challenges I provided and for good reason. but lets pretend I’m the problem and not cryo misleading everybody

        since I was now used to think that cu=better due to my OWN test under 3.4 and it’s precursors.

        not you were wrong then just as you thought you were right at the beginning of this post.

        • Gaeus_@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well mate. If I was wrong about 3.4, then consider this the fourth time (I think) I’ve asked you about benchmark of cu vs non-cu on a steamdeck pre 3.5