Nvidia’s “super high end chips” like V100, A100, and H100 meant for HPC don’t get used for high end gaming. In A100 and H100’s case, they don’t even have the full graphic pipeline, while Volta and Hopper don’t even have their gaming GPU counterparts.
On the other hand, AMD’s APU would use the prior generation of GPU core compared to their discrete GPU.
It’ll always be an uphill battle for AMD because they just don’t invest in their GPU division as much as their CPU division, and Nvidia, unlike Intel, continues to innovate and bring new technologies to the market. In short, AMD got lucky on the CPU side because it caught Intel napping.
The problem is that NVIDIA makes super high end chips for HPC and scales them down for gaming.
AMD makes integrated graphics for APUs and SOCs and scales them up for gaming.
So it will always be an uphill battle for AMD.
Throw in historically low market share and competition from Intel on the low end, it may not be financially viable
AMD does make professional GPU.
This is wrong on so many level.
Nvidia’s “super high end chips” like V100, A100, and H100 meant for HPC don’t get used for high end gaming. In A100 and H100’s case, they don’t even have the full graphic pipeline, while Volta and Hopper don’t even have their gaming GPU counterparts.
On the other hand, AMD’s APU would use the prior generation of GPU core compared to their discrete GPU.
It’ll always be an uphill battle for AMD because they just don’t invest in their GPU division as much as their CPU division, and Nvidia, unlike Intel, continues to innovate and bring new technologies to the market. In short, AMD got lucky on the CPU side because it caught Intel napping.
They didn’t claim that they get used for gaming.