• Temporary-Map4810@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can someone please explain to me, apart from the shimmer which is clearly visible like OP said, how is DLSS trillion times better and worth paying hundreds of dollars more for? Like can you enunciate, because I have an RTX 3050 Ti and I use DLSS and FSR both at 1080p. DLSS has less motion artifacts, but apart from that, I would not consider it to be a million times better to the point that I would buy a slower and more expensive card just to have DLSS.

    • conquer69@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because motion artifacts is the main downside of playing at a lower resolution. The constant pixel shimmering, ghosting and unstable image sucks ass and DLSS greatly alleviates it.

      FSR2 still has all the visual artifacts which makes upscaling from a lower resolution an all around worse option for AMD cards. Even native resolution FSR has them.

      People would rather play and render at 1080p and use DLSS to upscale to 4K than render at 1440p and upscale with FSR. That’s rendering 81% more pixels and still outputting a worse result. The discrepancy is big enough to add in some RT options and still come out ahead in both visuals and performance.

    • Vhirsion@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sad to see you get downvoted, like yeah DLSS is better, but as you said, it’s not a trillion billion gazillion times better, I have had a 5700 XT, 3090 and now a 7900 XTX, DLSS is good but I wouldn’t buy a more expensive Nvidia card just to get that.