so you saying the maker must open source all the software and IP and internal deisnges of every chip not to mention provide the tooling and rigs they used to make them for free to any factory that wants to make rip offs?
Microsoft and Apple are destroying innovation, and have so for decades. It’s what monopolies and oligopolies do. We need a phone with an open-source publicly funded platform that doesn’t gatekeep development.
that is very different form forcing the existing platforms to open source… publicly funding the development of a open platform is rather different to writing ga law that just removes all the existing IP from a privately funded company.
so you saying the maker must open source all the software and IP and internal deisnges of every chip not to mention provide the tooling and rigs they used to make them for free to any factory that wants to make rip offs?
Microsoft and Apple are destroying innovation, and have so for decades. It’s what monopolies and oligopolies do. We need a phone with an open-source publicly funded platform that doesn’t gatekeep development.
that is very different form forcing the existing platforms to open source… publicly funding the development of a open platform is rather different to writing ga law that just removes all the existing IP from a privately funded company.
No, I’m pretty sure what they said is the thing in their post, not the different thing in yours