I couldn’t find any info on N6’s power efficiency, but it’s a slight improvement on N7+, and N7+ is 15% more efficient than N7.
I couldn’t find any info on N6’s power efficiency, but it’s a slight improvement on N7+, and N7+ is 15% more efficient than N7.
But they still haven’t put the first Steam Deck on sale ^^^^^^in ^^^^^^my ^^^^^^country
They’re not, those are the cheapest/slowest GPUs that have 8 GB of VRAM. Clearly game devs are done pandering to people who bought Nvidia’s e-waste.
Oh look, it’s the constant nvidia troll making obvious bait content, how unusual.
Turing had DLSS 2 support at that point already while AMD didn’t even have FSR1 out yet.
No it didn’t, DLSS 2 didn’t exist until 2020.
Turing supports RT. RDNA1 does not.
RT was never relevant on a 2060 Super, it’s too slow even without RT to ever make it worth turning RT on. Anyone who wasn’t drinking the kool-aid knew that RT’s demands were going to outstrip the first generation hardware, that’s how it always works with new technology.
Turing is DX12 Ultimate compliant. RDNA1 was not.
Which has been completely irrelevant until now, when it only matters in a single game.
This “everyone” who knew Turing would age better have been proven completely wrong, the 5700 XT still murders the 2060 Super in the vast majority of games over 4 years later.
Why would anyone buy 15th, 16th, 17th… gen if this is the loyalty Intel shows to their customers?