Well I assume that the video output is not HDCP protected? Therefore it assumes you could be recording the hdmi signal or something.
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: October 23rd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
SirMaster@alien.topBtoHardware•Apple officially unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max: 3 nanometer, Dynamic Caching GPU, moreEnglish
1·3 years agoOn another note…
-
Memory bandwidth is down. M2 Pro had 200GB/s, M3 Pro only has 150GB/s. M3 Max only has 400GB/s on the higher binned part.
-
Just like the low-spec M3 14" has one fewer Thunderbolt port, it also doesn’t officially support Thunderbolt 4 (like M1/M2 before it)
-
The M3 Pro loses the option for an 8TB SSD. Likely because it was a low volume part for that spec.
-
The M3 Pro actually has more E-cores than the Max (6 vs 4). Interesting to see them take this away on a higher-specced part; seems like Intel wouldn’t do this
-
SirMaster@alien.topBtoHardware•NVIDIA RTX 40 SUPER rumored specs emerge, RTX 4080 SUPER with full AD103 GPU and 10240 CUDA cores - VideoCardz.com [From Kopite7kimi on X]English
1·3 years agoDidn’t they price cut the 4070?

I wouldn’t say it’s necessarily unrealistic.
They found burn-in with 700 hours of 16:9.
But how long should the monitor go before burning in?
3 years? In 1.5 years, 700 hours of 16:9 is only about 1.2 hours a day of 16:9 content which is not unrealistic in the slightest. Even double that is not unrealistic and burn-in in less than 1 year…
That’s certainly problematic.
This is exactly what happened to my monitor. Visible burn-in in 10 months, and 1.5 years on now it’s even worse.