Yeah you put it in better perspective than anybody. You are right, It’s incredibly minuscule, but I think there’s value to caring about every Wh or kWh. A little bit everywhere goes a long ways

Having a 60fps and 144fps monitor is my fault? Get real

If the is was true, there would be at least one monitor setup that does below 50w at idle with a dual setup, 144hz and 60hz.

I don’t think the internet has seen that on a 7000 series with dual mismatched, ever, without a workaround to lower refresh.

So could we get model numbers of monitors to test to verify this is being worked on? Could give a lot of people hope. Thanks.

Nvidia’s issue was 30W-40W in extreme cases, not 100W+, vastly different and incomparable.

you would see 110+ on that setup on AMD right now.

This has not been a hardware acceleration issue since VERY early drivers!