I love how min maxing everything is getting out of control.
Mission accomplished. It’s radiant m8
Why does anyone buy a processor with overclocking capabilities and then conduct tests, leaving it at default settings? The difference in higher resolutions is so minimal that even a slight overclock will equalize or alter the result. Additionally, nobody tests these processors in VR games where the processor is often a bottleneck for the GPU. Another thing, the games most players engage in are almost always designed for a low number of cores, usually 1-2, with the rest having low utilization. Core speed is still much more critical than their quantity. The ideal setup would be to have a large cache, fewer cores, and a high frequency, at least 5.5 GHz, but unfortunately, it’s not possible.
Weird to see how he tests with standard RAM on the 7800X3D but expensive DDR5-7600 RAM for the Intel CPU. You’d think he would compare under similar conditions and not give one of them an unfair advantage.
The 5800x3d is better than the 14700k for gaming too
It seems that if AMD is marginally better at gaming on average while drawing less power and generating less heat, the intel chip is only sensible for those who also do work that’s heavy on core performance.
As a computer builder for my own shop I am staying away from the 3D chips, had two 78003d fail within 2 months, and amds rma process is terrible.
I got a 13900k for $425 so I’m back on Intel, but if AMD could offer their 7800x3d at sub $300 I definitely wouldn’t have sprung for that deal. Buying under half the multithreaded performance for a mere $60 in savings didn’t really appeal to me (especially since I run an Unraid server and put parts from my gaming desktop in there once I upgrade).
Why even make, post or repost a video like this? It’s the same story that’s already been told by more reputable content creators:
The 7800x3d wins 90+% of the gaming benchmarks, while often using less than half the wattage.
The Intel parts do much better in core heavy productivity work (no shit).
Nothing to see here, keep it moving.
It seems that if AMD is marginally better at gaming on average while drawing less power and generating less heat, the intel chip is only sensible for those who also do work that’s heavy on core performance.
Im pretty sure noone would notice a 15% fps difference not to mention 3 or 5 % in that particular situation. For me AMD performance is not the game changer (pun intended). The power efficiency is.
AMD this generation is the clear winner on the gaming side which is great because it is something we have all needed in the industry.
But you cannot build a competitive system for overall specs and features offerings for a decent prince in comparison to what the offering on Intel can be. Which for people that are looking to continue on the all AMD builds and continue to have the same productivity offerings and gaming performance this 7000 series generations just isn’t for us. It is a tad frustrating.
Dude don’t believe the hype Intel knows it can compete with and that’s why they have e cores disable them and you see the truth you have enough performance at and mt with amd if you need more move up the stack
AMD this generation is the clear winner on the gaming side which is great because it is something we have all needed in the industry.
Ugh i had love hate relationship with my X3D chip, constant usb disconnects, RMA’d both cpu and mobo and it didnt change. Just like with gpu (and i dont have particular favorutie brand as i had both amd cpu and gpu in the past 2 years~), going AMD is always risk of annoying, often unfixable issues that may or may not happen. Like nowadays when u buy new AMD GPU its 50/50 if u will experience idle draw bug depending on your monitor setup and 50/50 if u will experience paste pumpout/hotspot issues and will be forced to RMA/repaste brand new card. Mental.
Oh, another generic benchmark video without power consumption and temps. 🥱
Pretty sure the 7800 is always consistently at 56w
Pretty sure the 7800 is always consistently at 56w
14700k all day
“The worse one all day.”
Interesting choice if gaming is your concern.
I mean if you don’t care about your electricity bill sure? Lol
I know the 7800x3d get more frames… but i just feel like it’s an overall weaker CPU besides in gaming where i gets more FPS. But the 1% lows is lower than the intel and as long as I get above 60FPS as my monitor only doeos 60hz(old monitor) then it doesn’t matter.
But better 1% lows means it’s a faster processor overall and I like a smoother feelign system that can last longer.
If you’re buying a 7800x3d, you really should be running something faster than a 60hz monitor