• bazooka_penguin@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    2800 in Geekbench ST at 4ghz doesn’t strike me as amazing, considering the Snapdragon 8 gen 3/Cortex x4 leaks point to a geekbench score of 2200-2300 at 3.3Ghz.

    • basil_elton@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perf/clock in Geekbench ST is in line with the leaked Cortex X4 scores. Yeah mobile phones don’t have 8533 MT/s LPDDR5x, but still it is really impressive.

    • AlexLoverOMG@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the end the ratio that matters is power use per performance, frequency within the same architecture is generally tied to power draw but comparing different architectures can have different power/clock speed curves.

    • Vince789@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Note that’s the GB6 ST in Windows, it would be around 3030 for Linux which is more comparable to Android

      Still I’d agree IPC isn’t amazing compared to Apple or Arm, which I guess sorta makes sense given NUVIA were originally targeting servers, where MT+efficiency is the main focus not ST

      IMO how quickly Qualcomm can iterate on the X Elite will be critical to their success (that and Microsoft pulling their weight on the software front)

      We’ve seen several companies release decently competitive custom Arm cores, but then fail to keep up with Arm’s rapid yearly development

      E.g. Samsung’s Exynos M, NVIDIA’s Denver, and Cavium’s ThunderX2 all started reasonably competitive with Arm, but fell further and further behind in their following iterations