I overclocked my steam deck, and now it runs at a 90% locked 30 fps in new Atlantis.

So, I’d say within the next update and maybe Proton update, we can see it improve heavily.

  • NotTheSun0@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The game is just unoptimized as hell

    Barely looks any better than Fallout 4 and Skyrim but runs significantly worse

    • kinos141@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s also not a fun game. It’s a busy work simulator. I’m sitting there playing the game and am just doing stuff.

      • NotTheSun0@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You mean you don’t like finding ways around hours of senseless grinding just to make the game a little bit more than barley tolerable?

        I would much rather play Skyrim, Oblivion, Fallout 3, or New Vegas.

    • greentea05@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And to think before it launched and soon after it came out I got downvoted to hell for saying graphically it doesn’t look very good.

      • saveryquinn@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This. I returned Starfield after spending half an hour in the character creator where the graphics looked significantly improved, Unreal Engine 5 level, and then got into the game and saw that my character looked straight out of Fallout 3 and cursed Todd Howard for making me waste half an hour of my life.

      • CatatonicMan@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Starfield’s graphical quality is a weird mix of good and bad.

        On one hand, the planet environments and skyboxes are pretty damn good looking.

        On the other hand, the people - especially the animations - still look like animatronics. Granted they’re more detailed than previous games, but they still have that vaguely robotic, uncanny valley feel to them.

        I can’t say the NASApunk theme is doing them any favors, either. It’s just…uninteresting. Pedestrian.

        Also, as an aside: graphics are the least of Starfield’s problems. I’d be perfectly happy to accept subpar graphics if the rest of the game was stellar. Sadly, it is not.

        • Taxxor90@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The second you talk to an NPC is the second you notice it’s a Bethesda Game because it looks like it looked for the past 15+ years and better textures can’t hide those animations.

          • kshep9@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Honestly I couldn’t get very far in the game after realizing that…to be fair there’s so many other better games out right now…

          • jwithy@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Personally my fave is how everyone I talk to looks over their shoulder with their back to me instead of turning to face me 😂

      • STP31@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Graphics are fine it’s the complete lack of style or interesting art direction.

        Honestly modded morrowind looks better at least there is interesting things to look at

        • Shpaan@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I partially disagree. I think the game has horrendous faces and facial animations and the majority of the planets are barren wastelands, but there’s definitely beauty and style to be found. I very much like the “NASA-punk” aesthetics they chose.

          • MichaelW24@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Bethesda does a lot of copy paste on their dialogue too. Have you heard they’re reforming the dawnguard? Vampire hunters or something

        • lonewolf7002@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Starfield definitely had “a style” to it. Whether it was good or interesting is debatable but it definitely had a style to it that permeated the whole game. A shame they covered it up with god-awful, ugly ass insta filters. It looks like someone pissed on my screen so I’ve been referring to it as the “piss filter”. The game had the potential to look SO much better, and then they did… that… to it.

    • LavosYT@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it looks much better than Skyrim or FO4 (to a lesser extent) - or at least, much more advanced in tech. There’s better shaders and lighting (interiors can look really nice), much more complex models, geometry and materials overall. Optimization is another matter of course.

    • futbol1216@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m glad someone finally said it on this sub. Was getting tired of all the “it’s amazing on the deck. Best version” shitty posts. I love my deck but Starfield is straight ass on it.

      Edit: looked at a few posts on here and the circle jerk is still happening. Either these people are blind or brand new to gaming.

      • EliasStar24@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I Guess is that a lot of people come from consoles where 20-30 fps is fine to them because they are used to it

        • futbol1216@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You do have a great point. I bought the ultimate version or whatever and I was out after a couple of hours. 😩

      • NotPinkaw@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What are you on about ? The sub trashed Starfield on deck since it launched. You’re blind my guy.

        • Upper-Dark7295@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol not even close, this sub was filled with astroturfing on release. Took a week, just like most other platforms, for everyone to admit the game was ass, let alone admitting it ran bad

    • STP31@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cyberpunk imo blows starfield out of the water visually and it runs perfectly fine at a smooth 40fps on my deck

    • Hopalongtom@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Likely because it’s a mess of procedural generation, it’s working harder than it needs to because there are almost no hand crafted assets.