• CaptainCapitol@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    consider the impact this could make on someting else… do we really need a new cpu, or would it be better allocated to figure out how to stop famine, wars, disease?

  • ICallFireStaff@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Intel has outsourced part of its production to external foundries for decades, and the benefits outweigh the negatives. Additionally, the company is in a better technological position than when it struggled to get 10nm chips out the door. If Intel had allowed itself to produce its CPUs at TSMC back then, then perhaps it wouldn’t have lost as much market share to AMD as it has in recent years.”

  • solid-snake88@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s a good tactic for Intel - stuff TSMC foundries with Intel wafers so other companies have to use intels foundries

    • topdangle@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      uhh Apple straight up buys entire runs of TSMC nodes. AMD, Nvidia and Intel combined wouldn’t have enough money for that strategy to work.

      • PsyOmega@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nvidia does. AMD doesn’t.

        Intel probably could, but their margins are too slim.

        • CompetitiveGuess7642@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Intel’s strategy is probably shifting towards higher margin products, I’d guess a lot of older intel nodes get bought for mil purposes.

    • Large_Armadillo@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      its already really good and the most interesting thing happening right now… but they need to implement frame generation.

      • topdangle@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        get driver performance up to par then worry about that. in games where they’ve fixed drivers the performance is fantastic for the price. in other games they’re slow or unplayable.

        though I suppose the next design may need less time on drivers since apparently the current design has memory handling issues resolved by software.

        • 93LEAFS@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          has it expanded into frame generation yet, or is it like early DLSS and FSR where it’s primarily upscaling an image. Frame generation is a bit different than that.

  • Stinkytofu86@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    amd made the smart move to ditch semiconductor production and focus on designing and outsourcing, cheaper and more profitable, intel probably realize it by now

  • Valuable_Second_5985@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So finally leaving 10nm behind for dies that could greatly benefit from more advanced nodes?

    I guess it won’t take too many years from now on to get good battery life from an Intel laptop. Most AMDs still get 1.5-2 times the battery life, all else equal. This can only be good.

  • techjesuschrist@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe my next platform will be Intel again, if the Intel finally makes a CPU that’s faster than the competition and at the same time doesn’t consume as much power as a high end GPU. Basically I want the Haswell times back (AMD was slower ,inefficient, hot and a power hog compared to Intel even if Intel only had half the cores)… until then I’ll stay with Ryzen.

  • shawman123@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Big question is when would Intel start getting chips from N3B. If its H2 of 2024 then capacity wont be an issue as TSMC should have both N3B/N3E in production and can support anyone who is ready to pay. Obviously Intel is using TSMC for all GFX tiles across all chips and also all non CPU products like Gaudi though Gaudi 3 is just on N5(which is weird in 2024).

    • PsyOmega@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Intel will still produce domestic CPUs. There is too large a market not to, in the corporate and government sectors.

      They’re just also doing orders externally. These will largely all be consumer-only segments.

  • GamersGen@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    so when are these new ‘next gen’ intel 5nm?? hitting the shelfs exactly? I am sitting on 9900k waiting to be finally put to rest, but it was a great cpu even now playing everything at 4k60+ with 4090

    • soggybiscuit93@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know of any Intel nodes called “5nm”, but Intel 4 based client chips are launching in laptops on Dec. 14th, and 20A based desktop chips are launching sometime next year, likely in the typical October - November timeframe Intel usually launches desktop chips.

    • Invest0rnoob1@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The 5nm are for data centers only I believe. Arrow Lake for customers is 2nm and that’s supposed to be late 2024/ early 2025

  • ResponsibleJudge3172@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I remember Nvidia spent like $11 Billion in 2021 in preparation of current gen chips so $14 billion on chips including thos on N3B checks out