IIRC chrome still uses the CPU to decode VP9/AV1, you need to use firefox for full hardware decode.
Or use h264ify
IIRC chrome still uses the CPU to decode VP9/AV1, you need to use firefox for full hardware decode.
Or use h264ify
Surface 3?
And the high end atoms are literally faster than the dual core CPUs found in the surface go.
Intel locked down xeon CPUs with x299, so you cant put them in the consumer socket.
Also, anything past 18 cores uses the 3466 socket so it wouldn’t be able to fit in x299 anyways.
Even then, it will still power throttle based on the OEM settings.
OP probably doesn’t know the difference.
Wait till OP learns smart phone CPUs spend most of their time at low clock speeds.
Isn’t this an obvious fake by someone who doesn’t even know what MTL is set up like?
Eg: they have an 8MB L4 cache on the CPU die for LNL when MTL has a 128MB cache on SOC die.
And the renders for the on package memory have the two memory chips separate from the die with no safe area on the package border, when Intel would traditionally try to have them right next to each other.
And why use N3 when Intel will have Backside power with their 3nm node?
Because this came out of someone’s ass.
Xe Max, Iris Plus, Iris Pro,
These have literally not been on sale for a few years now, so unless you’re buying used you won’t see them.
At the end of the day, I’m close to just saying Ryzen 7000 series and getting a 660m or 680m, because I know they’re powerful, and at least I can look up their model number
You do realize that you need a decoder wheel to find out what generation an AMD CPU is right?
Lol, it’s hilarious how people automatically cope when it comes to apple products.
Won’t arrow lake be using backside power delivery?
That will be bringing higher clocks for free.
And there’s people that claim otherwise.
It’s similar to when Mac OS accepted an empty password at login.
Pretty sure this sub will use the same defense as /r/apple did.
They’re not binning anything, they’re just reading SP values.
Didn’t even realize it was a windows issue.
Thats because AMD just glued together dies on their desktop CPUs to make MCM CPUs, and called them chiplets.
Eg. The thing that Intel and IBM had already done years before.
Apple’s MCM CPUs are power efficient because the dies are right next to each other, but those CPUs cost many times more than either Intel’s or AMDs CPUs.
Intel is trying to leapfrog Apple and AMD by making tiled CPUs, but the packaging method is way more complex and expensive than either of its competitors.
Isn’t that the Norwegian strategy?