It's been four years since AMD launched RDNA, the successor to the venerable GCN graphics architecture. We take a look through the tech and numbers to see...
RDNA 1 was fine, RDNA 2 was good, RDNA 3 is disappointing. RDNA3 could have been great, but AMD continues to deliver lackluster RT Performance combined with bad pricing and software problems (FSR3 and Anti-Lag+). If the current line up was 100$ cheaper it would have been good.
RDNA 1 was fine, RDNA 2 was good, RDNA 3 is disappointing. RDNA3 could have been great, but AMD continues to deliver lackluster RT Performance combined with bad pricing and software problems (FSR3 and Anti-Lag+). If the current line up was 100$ cheaper it would have been good.