It's been four years since AMD launched RDNA, the successor to the venerable GCN graphics architecture. We take a look through the tech and numbers to see...
Bulldozer was the exact opposite in terms of how the units behaved. Currently, it’s nvidia with the ‘make moar corez’ meme, and AMD could have been in the reckoning for the top spot in raster with a chip that has like a third of the shaders of nvidia’s.
AMD’s failing this gen is again not improving the clockspeeds. And of course, not making a chip the size of nvidia’s flagchip.
As for RT, I don’t think the difference is that big hardware-wise. AMD are overperforming in raster and nvidia have sort of a software monopoly right now with the PT game being done with their collaboration.
Bulldozer was the exact opposite in terms of how the units behaved. Currently, it’s nvidia with the ‘make moar corez’ meme, and AMD could have been in the reckoning for the top spot in raster with a chip that has like a third of the shaders of nvidia’s.
AMD’s failing this gen is again not improving the clockspeeds. And of course, not making a chip the size of nvidia’s flagchip.
As for RT, I don’t think the difference is that big hardware-wise. AMD are overperforming in raster and nvidia have sort of a software monopoly right now with the PT game being done with their collaboration.
https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/16piqgn/cyberpunk_2077_20_pc_tech_review_dlss_35_ray/k1ugrv7/