It's been four years since AMD launched RDNA, the successor to the venerable GCN graphics architecture. We take a look through the tech and numbers to see...
Turing gen on gen is similar to RDNA3 and is exactly my point. AMD engineers are great, but don’t expect them to blow every market they enter. Just like how XCLIPSE GPU showed that Qualcomm is competitive in mobile GPUs
I keep asking who is it that believes AMD have the most superior talent such that they are destined to blow out all competition over time?
RDNA2 was AMD’s zen3 moment when the stars aligned, but so was Ampere for Nvidia
I mean, that’s because Turing failed to impress in everything except the 2080 Ti.
Pascal was just too good, it’ll never happen again. Hence: Ada generation being so meh except the 4090.
Turing gen on gen is similar to RDNA3 and is exactly my point. AMD engineers are great, but don’t expect them to blow every market they enter. Just like how XCLIPSE GPU showed that Qualcomm is competitive in mobile GPUs