so 4080 being 7% slower than 7900xtx in raster at 4K is a turd ?
what is slightly more performance ?
Well maybe mid end is where they gonna strike gold. So its smart to focus your resources and scale back the product stack. AMD always operates on value above all else , so making a product exclusively designed for it could be good.
And in alan wake 2 4090 is 4 times faster than 7900xtxt . Its all good
Damn, 4080 is so slow compared to 7900xtx /s
most people are using 1080p 60hz monitors with 3060s . What are you talking about. 30fps is playable, been playable since the dawn of video games . When crysis came out, no hardware that year could give you 50fps at 1024x768 resolution . Just think for a moment .
according to Steve textures is what makes games look good . He has been downplaying cyberpunk visuals every time , because to him textures are low res . For such an intelligent man with decades of experience he has no clue what makes games good looking .
re4 looks good, alan wake 2 looks leaps and bounds better than re4. Even a blind person could see
but the game is well optimized? Blame AMD for not including mesh shader support in RDNA 1
I see someone is already losing his shit over FSR 2 , just another day on this sub .
im sure we gonna have reasonable discussion and well adjusted commentary
It’s 20% slower at minimum
The more frames you have the clearer picture is in motion.