It's been four years since AMD launched RDNA, the successor to the venerable GCN graphics architecture. We take a look through the tech and numbers to see...
Honestly I think it should become a lot better in 5 to 10 years, since a lot of their problems seem to come from being understaffed. Keep in mind, they were a fairly small company on the verge of bankruptcy just a few years ago, and you can only onboard so many people each year without causing inefficiency.
So their competence in software as well as hardware should be improving, not getting worse.
Only if they do a complete 180 in philosophy as a course correction, which I just don’t see being the case; They’d have to admit that nvidia (and intel) are correct and their way was a mistake.
AMD GPU division is usually more than willing to double down on their mistakes when it comes to vision/philosophy over admitting that they made a mistake.
Honestly I think it should become a lot better in 5 to 10 years, since a lot of their problems seem to come from being understaffed. Keep in mind, they were a fairly small company on the verge of bankruptcy just a few years ago, and you can only onboard so many people each year without causing inefficiency.
So their competence in software as well as hardware should be improving, not getting worse.
Only if they do a complete 180 in philosophy as a course correction, which I just don’t see being the case; They’d have to admit that nvidia (and intel) are correct and their way was a mistake.
AMD GPU division is usually more than willing to double down on their mistakes when it comes to vision/philosophy over admitting that they made a mistake.